What does 'on background' allow a reporter to do?

• A. Use information without naming the source
• B. Quote the source directly
• C. Reveal the source’s identity to the public
• D. Disregard the source's comments

Answer: (A)

When a reporter is granted information "on background," it allows them to use the information while not attributing it to the specific source. This means that the reporter can share the insights or context provided, but they cannot name the individual or organization that provided those details. This practice is useful when the source wants to maintain confidentiality but still contribute valuable information to a story. It enables reporters to include essential information while protecting the identity of their informants, thereby fostering trust in the reporting process and allowing sources to speak more freely on sensitive subjects.

The other options do not accurately reflect the purpose of "on background." For instance, quoting the source directly contradicts the principle of maintaining confidentiality, while revealing the source's identity directly opposes the intent of providing information on background. Additionally, disregarding the source's comments does not align with the intention of using background information, which is to incorporate insights without directly disclosing where they came from.