Which practice involves journalists investigating corruption and advocating for social changes?

• A. Muckraking
• B. Fact-checking
• C. Editorializing
• D. Public Relations

Answer: (A)

Muckraking is the practice that involves journalists taking on the role of investigators to expose corruption, wrongdoing, and injustices within society. This approach goes beyond mere reporting; it aims to shed light on issues that are often hidden from public view, prompting readers to acknowledge problems and advocate for social changes. Muckrakers typically delve into complex issues such as political corruption, corporate greed, and social injustices, often resulting in significant impacts on public policy and societal norms.

This practice has historical roots in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when journalists like Upton Sinclair and Ida B. Wells focused their work on uncovering abuses and advocating for reform. Their investigations often led to heightened public awareness and legislative changes, highlighting the power of journalism as a tool for social change.

The other options relate to different aspects of journalism or communication that do not directly involve the investigative zeal typical of muckraking. Fact-checking is a method that verifies the accuracy of information rather than advocating for change. Editorializing involves expressing opinions or commentary on various issues but does not inherently include investigation into corruption. Public relations focuses on managing and shaping the image of organizations or individuals rather than exposing societal issues.